Thursday, October 25, 2018

Two Bloggers One Book - An Accidental Buddy Read


Stormi and I had our monthly buddy read all planned out at the beginning of the month but we were both sucked in by a new title and ended up reading it at the same time without really planning to do so.  Therefore, we decided to share our thoughts with you on this one and save the other one for later.
Once you read my review, make sure to check out Stormi's @ Books, Movies, Reviews! Oh My!  However, I don't think either of us enjoyed this month's feature.

TITLE: The Boy at the Keyhole
AUTHOR: Stephen Giles
PUBLISHER: Hanover Square Press
PUBLISHING DATE: September 4, 2018

FROM GOODREADS: An electrifying debut in the vein of Shirley Jackson and Daphne Du Maurier’s Rebecca, about a British boy who, after his mother is abruptly called away to America, begins to suspect that perhaps she did not leave, but was murdered—by the housekeeper who cares for him in the family's isolated country estate.

Nine-year-old Samuel lives alone in a once great estate in Surrey with the family’s housekeeper, Ruth. His father is dead and his mother has been abroad for five months, purportedly tending to her late husband’s faltering business. She left in a hurry one night while Samuel was sleeping and did not say goodbye.

Beyond her sporadic postcards, Samuel hears nothing from his mother. He misses her dearly and maps her journey in an atlas he finds in her study. Samuel’s life is otherwise regulated by Ruth, who runs the house with an iron fist. Only she and Samuel know how brutally she enforces order.

As rumors in town begin to swirl, Samuel wonders whether something more sinister is afoot. Perhaps his mother did not leave, but was murdered—by Ruth.

Channeling the masterful suspense of Daphne Du Maurier's Rebecca and the haunting, claustrophobic atmosphere of the works of Shirley Jackson, The Boy at the Keyhole is an electrifying debut about the precarious dance between truth and perception, and the shocking acts that occur amid tightly knit quarters.

MY THOUGHTS:  I think the above synopsis details the book pretty well. Samuel's mother left over 4 months ago setting sail for America in an attempt to save her deceased husband's business.  Samuel is stuck staying with Ruth, the housekeeper, who is not the nicest person in the world.  Fueled by his friend's overactive imagination, Samuel starts to suspect Ruth has done something to his mother preventing her from returning (unless it would be in ghostly form - hey, that might have been more interesting!).  Samuel tries to unravel the mystery of what happened to his mother but what he learns may be more terrible than he ever imagined.

So first of all.  This book is classified as an adult thriller.  I usually don't get hung up on genres and age recommendations but I think the publishing company missed the boat and should have geared this toward YA or MG.  Also, I honestly couldn't stand anyone in this book.  Samuel is a spoiled brat and Ruth is crotchety and mean.  They both kind of deserve each other and if the mom did in fact skip the country, she may have had the right idea and just may be the smartest one in the book.  The ending was disappointing and overall I was just glad it was over.

This is a relatively short read and I had high expectations for a Gothic atmospheric tale.  Glad I was able to grab this one from the library and didn't spend good money on it.  And one final caution - without including any specific spoilers, I will leave you with a closing picture.  If you don't want to risk learning too much STOP READING NOW!

If you love bunnies - step away from the book!

RATING: 2 PAWS


22 comments:

  1. Aw, I'm sorry you didn't enjoy this. It was a slow start, but the ending really grabbed me -- but I don't read books like this often, so I may be easily impressed in that regard lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm glad you enjoyed it and I had high hopes. I think I needed more action or something.

      Delete
  2. Oh no, not bunny bashers! I couldn't read anything like that and those characters sound horrific!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I'm pretty confident you would hate this one.

      Delete
  3. No not bunnies?!!! I love bunnies, so thanks for the warning. Also, I love how you guys didn't exactly plan this buddy read😁

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, it kind of just happened. We read so many of the same books that each month, we almost always have several in common even though we just feature one.

      Delete
  4. Think I'll pass on this one! Thanks for the warning. :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. I knew when you got to the bunny it would be mentioned in your review...lol. :) I hope next months pick is better! :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Me too. We've had a good run so it was bound to happen eventually.

      Delete
  6. I love bunnies so I'll steer clear. It looks like you and Stormi both had the same feels about this one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, it was fun to bash on it together while we were reading it.

      Delete
  7. I'll steer clear too. Too bad the title lured you in. They got that part right.
    sherry @ fundinmental

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yea, it could have been a good premise but wasn't executed the best.

      Delete
  8. I'm stepping away. Just look at that adorable bunny.
    Lynn :D

    ReplyDelete
  9. Not the bunnies! :'( sounds like I should skip this book anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I don't think that I will be picking this one up. It is not nice to go around harming cute little bunnies.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Of course, just from reading the synopsis, I would NEVER pick up this one, Barb! Not even from the library. Lol. But I just had to comment on your review, which I really enjoyed reading! Especially the part about Ruth and Samuel deserving each other! LOL. Sure looks like the author entirely missed the boat....and what's up with the bunny? Did a bunny get hurt at the end?! This author should be totally ashamed of himself!! GRRRR!!!!

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts! HUGS TO YOU AND THE PUPS, AND "WOOF, WOOF" TO THEM!!! <3 <3 <3 :) :) :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The poor boy had a wild bunny outside which visited him and he fed it from the garden. It came up missing about the same time they had rabbit for dinner.

      Delete